The death of Gore Vidal

•August 1, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Beautifully put out there for us all by Derek Flynn.

Derek Flynn's avatarRant, with occasional music

The American writer Gore Vidal, died on Tuesday evening aged 86, from pneumonia. He passing signals the end of a group of writers whose heyday was in the 60s and 70s and who were known for their uncompromising prose and their often controversial views. They became fixtures of the chat show circuit in the 70s when cigarette smoke still wafted around the studio, as did intelligent conversation. Those days are long gone.

Vidal was part of a loose affiliation of writers whose novels and essays changed the face of American Literature. Norman Mailer, Truman Capote, and Hunter S Thompson were the other writers whose fierce, relentless writing scorched across the landscape of American letters. Capote died young, the victim of alcohol and drugs, in 1984; Thompson committed suicide in 2005; Mailer died in 2007. And now the last of the literary outlaws has passed.

Something that made these writers seem…

View original post 324 more words

My baby does Neil Young

•July 14, 2012 • 1 Comment

“Sick, man…sick.”

•June 16, 2012 • Leave a Comment


The beatnik Banty rooster is the coolest thing I’ve ever seen.

The Birds

•June 14, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Totally have to reblog this one, only one of my favorite movies EVER! Thank you, Angela!

Angela's avatarLA Screenwriter

The Birds was written by Evan Hunter based on the novel Birds by Daphne Du Maurier.

View original post

The Night Stalker

•June 1, 2012 • 1 Comment

I just learned Edgar Wright will be directing a new version of the creepy, often goofy The Night Stalker.  Yes, I did watch the television series with Stuart Townsend and Gabrielle Union and even bought the DVD though it bore little resemblance to the tone of the original series or the character played by Darren McGavin.

Who will be starring as reporter Carl Kolchak in the newest remake?

Mr. Johnny Depp

(Love Depp, but I want to start a petition for Simon Pegg to play Kolchak instead, with Nick Frost playing his boss, the always angry editor, Vincenzo.  :)

Have viewed the movie The Night Strangler several times since finding it on YouTube, whenever I’m craving a moment with the hat, the grimace, and that frumpy blue suit.  It just ain’t Kolchak without the suit.

Vernal Equinox and Frog DNA

•March 20, 2012 • 2 Comments

(Insert music and lyrics of The Guess Who here: “There’s a new mother nature taking over. There’s a new splendid lady come to call…”)

On this first day of Spring I awakened to the strangest conversation going on in my head. Someone was telling me to study the DNA of a frog because that is how our DNA is going to change. My grousing response was to ask why I would care, and the answer was “Because you’ll be here after that, but in another form.”

Talk about a way to open your eyes at four in the morning (now insert cartoon character with goggling orbs the size of dinner plates.)

“…study the DNA of a frog because that is how your DNA is going to change.”

My first thought was a full second of brain-stammering Huh? and then a prompt to repeat it to myself so I would remember what was said after I was fully awake.

“”Because you’ll be here after that, but in another form.”

My second thought was “Dammit, you mean I have to come back again?”

I have got to get better at doing things right the first time.  And I’ll get right on that frog thing.  Promise.

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5978/555.short

PS: There was a movie from the 70’s called Frogs with a Sam Elliott like you’ve never seen him.  Anyone else see it?

Rolling in Clover

•March 12, 2012 • Leave a Comment

From YourDictionary:  What does “in clover” mean?

Prosperous, living well. For example, After we make our first million, we’ll be in clover. This expression alludes to cattle happily feeding on clover. Slightly different versions are like pigs in clover and rolling in clover. [c. 1700]

Four-Leaf Clovers

Four-Leaf Clovers

The superstition of the four-leaf clover is thought to originate with the Druids. Apparently they believed the shamrock helped them to see evil spirits, thereby allowing them time to get away or find a safe hide-out. The four-leaf clover was also used to ward off evil as it provided a magical repellent that would turn away bad luck. The bearer of the clover was also able to see fairies and this became a very popular past-time with children in the middle ages. Young adventurers would go out each day to find four-leaf clovers and once they found them, would then proceed to look for fairies among the flowers and fields.

The three-leaf clover is also associated with good luck as it is believed to be a symbol for the Holy Trinity. By wearing a three- or a four-leaf clover, good luck is brought to the bearer.

The above is from The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry

Some of those ‘evil spirits’ mentioned were  likely confused  with other little mischief makers.  You can read stories of encounters at the link below.

http://paranormal.about.com/od/fairieslittlepeople/a/Encounters-With-Little-People.htm?nl=1

My favorite Little People story comes not from Ireland, but from Argentina:

In the Muncipality of Merlo a one hundred year old eucalyptus tree near a library was said to be obscuring the visibility of motorists and causing problems with telephone lines so the tree was scheduled for a trimming operation. Traffic halted for a time while the work progressed and when traffic resumed, several motorists claimed to see strange figures illuminated by their headlights. They saw what appeared to be little men coming single file out of the tree and walking toward the library, wearing what one woman described as clothing of a “brownish hue”.

For years there were stories of “imp” sightings in the district, hidden among the branches and leaves of the old tree and once the trimming operation was complete some claim because of the red wood of the eucalyptus it appeared as if the tree was bleeding.

UPDATE: Check out this video.
And this one:

•March 3, 2012 • Leave a Comment

The story of the ‘Cave Children’ is impossible to resist, it conjures up so many questions.

John Steinbeck said a writer should be read and not seen.

•February 22, 2012 • 4 Comments

At four this morning I was restless and turned on the telly to find a black and white film featuring five stories by O. Henry (a.k.a. William Sydney Porter) being introduced by author John Steinbeck.  The first thing I heard him say was that he always believed a writer should be read and not seen.

I am of the same mind.

The first time I saw a portrait of Shakespeare I was mildly disappointed. How could someone of such genius be so ordinary looking?  I’ve felt the same about other writers many times since, and though I’m aware of how shallow and ridiculous this makes me seem, I’m pathetically human and I still feel it.

When I try to examine what it is that makes me so disappointed I realize it all comes down to perception.  When I examine Shakespeare’s works I perceive a golden mind behind the tale and am deflated to find only flesh and blood, and very routine flesh and blood at that. It makes me wonder if this is why some choose not to believe he actually wrote the plays and poems he is so famous for having written (as in the film Anonymous.)  Are they looking for a golden being to go with the golden mind?

I surmise that I too disappoint.

At signings I was frequently greeted with: “Did something terrible happen to you as a child?”  Inwardly I wanted to howl, clutch my breast and respond in a voice like Vincent Price‘s House of Usher character: “Yes! My God, yes and how is it that you alone have recognized this?”

I cannot imitate Vincent Price.  If I could I might have been so snotty, but instinctively I knew what prompted the question.  I was a disappointment.  They expected someone dark and scary and perhaps scarred or tattooed.  Instead they got me, a person they couldn’t reconcile with dark fiction.

My first agent begged me to become another Mary Higgins Clark.  I told her one existed already.  She then asked me to become like Anne Rice and appear somehow quirky or exotic, to have something that made me unusual. Again, I knew what prompted this: I was ordinary.  There was nothing dark or deviant about my appearance.  I couldn’t blame my first agent for scrabbling for a hook.  My reluctance was no doubt a part of our agreement to part ways.  Like Steinbeck, I couldn’t understand why anyone should want to see me.  My work should speak for itself.

Until my third novel most people believed I was a man.  Then some reviewer made a comment about me writing as well as any male horror author and the jig was up.  Believe it or not, sales immediately fell off, as if no one believed a woman could write horror as well as a man.  Well they believed it until they knew otherwise, which sucks for me, and for all the other female authors out there who are subtly, insanely discriminated against by book buyers.  The funny thing is, I do it too, because of the built-in erroneous perception that the really gritty, dark psychological stuff is not the same when written by a woman. It’s more like, well, like Mary Higgins Clark.  Which is not who I am.

Dammit.

•February 21, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Learn the stories behind the fatted bull and the dancing mosquito…